jump to navigation

102. Not every issue needs a battle October 27, 2012

Posted by Bettina Hansel in Culture and Communication.
Tags:
trackback

Like many people living in the USA right now, I can’t wait for the election season to end because at least the volume of political battles decreases. But the battles continue via our elected representatives, who seem to believe that holding an opinion firmly and never letting go is more important than governing wisely.

Politics has perhaps never really been about governing wisely as much as it has been about grappling to be the one with the power to decide. In my first (and only) serious foray into party politics at age 18, I was disillusioned to learn that the party leaders backing my candidate were setting up a slate of delegates that we all needed to vote for. One of my friends who was very interested in being a delegate was only offered the possibility to be an alternate on the slate. The party was managing the votes strategically and didn’t want any deviations from the slate that had been set up in a hotel room (almost certainly smoke-filled in that era) by a few players. We were just the troops brought in to support that strategy. The strategy failed and the party’s candidate lost.

While I understood the strategy and why is was necessary — the other side was doing it, too — this isn’t the way I wanted to believe that representative government worked. I had had the idea that conventions and Congress provided places where people would come together to talk about what would be best for the country, and that those with the best ideas would be heard by all present who would then join forces to implement those ideas. Of course, it’s been years since I had any expectation that legislators would search together for common solutions and policies. Even mission-driven, volunteer boards can be driven apart by political fighting.

When I think about the skills needed for building relationships across cultures, one is certainly the ability to move beyond polarized, defensive postures that draw sharp lines between “us” and “them.” These skills involve listening, suspending judgment, respect for others, and not holding too firmly to your own beliefs. I still hope for a world where leaders have these skills and the desire to work for peace: across nations, across cultures, and across political parties. It’s not about always agreeing, but about always thinking and always engaging others in that journey.

This may not feel like a very strong position from which to campaign in an election, of course. We probably like to support policies that seem simple to understand, and we probably chose candidates for reasons that don’t involve as much study or insight into the issues as we’d hope to do. I always want to select someone for president who seems to be smarter than I am, since I know I couldn’t begin to take on that job…not that I’d want to.

A recent opinion piece in the New York Times gave me some insight on why radical political solutions seem insufficient to me: I cannot explain how they work, and the more I study them the less I feel the policy seems to accomplish what it is supposed to. Probably no one political action will produce remarkable changes, but change happens nevertheless, much totally out of the control of the US President or Congress. As one voter interviewed on the television noted, “We will all have to do the best we can.”

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Jobe Leonard - November 27, 2012

Bettina,

I am a big fan of you exchange student guide and your blog. Thanks again for all your hard work you put into it. I could not agree more about the polarizing effects of national elections. I am from Tennessee, but this year was the first time I have actually been in the United States for a presidential election. I also found it odd how much people from other countries care about our elections when traveling abroad. Have you ever experienced this?

Best regards,

Jobe Leonard

Bettina Hansel - November 27, 2012

Thank you, Jobe!
I’m not sure I find it odd that people from other countries are interested in the US elections. I think many countries feel the impact of US policy and are naturally interested. I find that I am also interested in the elections of several other countries: India, Peru, and France because I’ve spent some time there, but I also pay attention to the elections in China, Japan, Israel, the UK, Germany, Brazil, and Turkey among others. Egypt is of course fascinating right now.

This year I attended a conference in Nashville, and that is certainly an interesting place, though I was only able to see typical tourist attractions. Nevertheless, it was eye-opening when one of the promoters for a downtown Nashville night club commented that he could never live in New York because of the stricter gun control laws in our state and city. I’m thinking more about the role of fear in the polarization within the US and between cultures in general. It’s not easy.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: